I enjoyed this book quite much. Albert Camus is one of my favorite writers, I've read his work since 2021, ranging from the first work I read 'The Myth of Sisyphus', to 'The Rebel', 'Exile and Kingdom', 'The Stranger', among others. What I interpreted about this book is that Camus dwells on the facility of observing life, and all the phenomena it presents to oneself when experimented.
The following parts of the book that resonated with me and my thoughts on them. The text in green indicates the caption from the literary text, and the paragraph below it is my interpretation, thoughts, and analysis of the literary fragment.
As stated in the paragraph, "indifference" is enough for the small things, while principles are delegated to great things; here perhaps is explained that great things are what matter in reality, the crux of the conversation, expertise, or idea. We humans require a subjective motor to ignite our willingness to proceed with such mundane experiences, this subjective mootor is what Camus calls "Maxims", they can be as bizarre as our historically structured psyche wants, but if courage is enough, those maxims will always trascend our objective, mundane experience. Especially if these maxims compel oneself to materialize one's idiosyncrasy, even better if such paradigm becomes fruitful.
Camus here describes what appears to be the so-called eureka moment. That moment when humans tend to attain a comprehensive view of the abstraction that lingered consciously or unconsciously in one's mind for a while and now acquires a comprehensible shape, narrative, and even methodology map.
Our goals are chains that we subjectively cover ourselves with thinking that such goals will cure the contemporary malady of our life. “A work of art must first of all make use of the dark forces of the soul”. However, we would be remiss if we don’t account for the role of mistakes and erroneous approaches, they reveal what is totally inaccurate and wrong, what derail us from that good, and for that, they serve and are labeled as important as any of their antonyms.
Humans will always be versitile, or perhaps mercurial when it comes of their goals, why? They will always indirectly or directly orbit around "love, wars, cries, and the folly of justice". The process between the present and the attainment of such goal is where life displays itself genuinely as is there where we act upon it.
What does he means by that? I am young (22 years old as of writing this) and do not turn such realization into an epigram, but perhaps into a form of fuel that ignites the impetus of escaping such future by changing one's future via materialization of creative functional products.
Damn, such a thoughtful question, it is not my case by the wya, thankfully to me for making it that way, although I got to admit, there was a time when you remember on a daily basis, instead of living. it is the thought of death and the ephemeral nature of time that frees you from such lifestyle.
What does he means? I am pretty sure this paragraph is a parable.
Camus describes such a feeling with a perfect analogy. When one has dreams, goals, impetus, or any name you want to call the reality we strive for, one tends to indirectly or directly describe or envisage the right agent that will be attaining such reality. Such an agent is an improved version of oneself (at least in comparison with our present self) since attaining such reality involves change, improvement, and enhancement in oneself, one’s abilities, one’s views, etc. Otherwise if one would already possess the aptitudes required for such reality one would’ve already attained it. If one hasn’t attained it, it isn’t about circumstances (at least that’s what we like to think), but about the insufficient knowledge and aptitude required for such a process that materializes such reality. This is why when we do the things we were supposed to do based on such an improved view we feel fulfilled and happy. Accomplished.
What I understand here is that people, or perhaps let’s use oneself as an example rather than speculating about people’s behavior. One can devote one’s life and time following trends, society’s labels, or people’s praise, however, doing so would lead to an endless pursuit of pride; ‘I did that’, ‘I am this’, ‘I like that’, actions merely done to receive praise, respect, or mere observation from people, which inevitably increases our pride. However, there is a second way to spend one’s time; by actually experimenting life from your perspective and judgment. Creating, materializing, and acting according to one’s intellect, judgment, interest, knowledge, and preeminently, intuition, all derive a unique situation in life in which one experiences one’s idiosyncrasy, instead of a collective idea of what life is supposed to be.
Unfortunately, I have to agree here. Although the act of materializing one’s idiosyncrasy is quite productive and yields to new approaches, an expansion of knowledge, and perhaps tangible byproducts that may improve your life overall, such action is not quite mingled with the act of living. Sure, it is living as you are expressing and materializing yourself, but there is a fundamental lack of human experiences, interactions, and preeminently: emotions. One might feel excitement while materializing, wonder, curiosity, and eureka moments, which are a way of living indeed, however, living also encompass emotions, feelings, psychological phenomena in general, which are mainly derived from human interactions, activities, and contemporary society, which isn’t negative after all as s thanks to other humans, and the mechanisms of society that we get to experience such enriching, empowering, and genuine way of living. When we materialize, we only produce, whereas when we live, we uptake experiences, we get to know others, and we get to know ourselves in the process. I rather say that materializing and living might be different, but they are efficient ways to know yourself, what you want, what you strive for.
What I understand here is that whenever one dreams, one ought to use such concoction of motivation, courage, envisage, and arrogance and apply them into the materialization of such dream, lending ourselves to the dream, and one must use such moments thoroughly and completely since those are the moments that dreams are lended to us, such moments are ephemeral, and after a few hours, they are gone, leaving only the mesmerizing vestige of the dreams, which serves as a compass for future approaches.
Exactly. Such harmony gives a sense of control. This sense is more gratifying (and therefore, deriving a higher amount of happiness) if it can be quantified. Observing one's progress numerically assures oneself of leadership and advancement in one's life, advancement towards that desired goal that we speculate to be the ultimate source of happiness.
Why is that? I hope a pseudo theory on the answer to that question: Because describing what we are fond of lightly compels us to use as concise words as possible in order to avoid leaving a stain on the description if we make it larger. Why is that a concern? Because if we extend our description of the reasoning behind the fondness of such activity, passion, emotion, discipline, or idea, we will not only find discrepancies within our own judgment and reasoning, but also the mundane impetus behind our fondness. Unless we are talking about pure passion…
Speculation, envy, reminiscense, self-absorption, anger, and any other emotion or action directly loses when faced with materialization. Materialization is the epitome of progress. Despite its accuracy towards the goal, it always reveals the proper path, either by trying, and scoring (following the path as a result), or trying and failing (changing the approach as a result). Trial and error is what drives progress.
First read: October 11, 2024 - December 12, 2024